<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://ir.tum.ac.ke/handle/123456789/17323">
<title>Department of Medical Sciences</title>
<link>http://ir.tum.ac.ke/handle/123456789/17323</link>
<description>Contains conferences/workshops for this department</description>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ir.tum.ac.ke/handle/123456789/17648"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-06-13T18:43:30Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://ir.tum.ac.ke/handle/123456789/17648">
<title>Viral Suppression among Men Who Have Sex with Men Living With HIV on Risk Reduction Interventions in Mvita Sub-County, Mombasa County, Kenya</title>
<link>http://ir.tum.ac.ke/handle/123456789/17648</link>
<description>Viral Suppression among Men Who Have Sex with Men Living With HIV on Risk Reduction Interventions in Mvita Sub-County, Mombasa County, Kenya
Wangui, J.K.; Ngure, Kenneth; Adem, Aggrey
Abstract&#13;
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare viral load suppression&#13;
levels among men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV&#13;
who were put on risk reduction interventions versus a control group&#13;
in Mvita sub-county, Mombasa County, Kenya between December&#13;
2020 and June 2021.&#13;
Methodology: A quasi-experimental study design using quantitative&#13;
methods was conducted among MSM living with HIV from December&#13;
2020 to June 2021. The study involved a questionnaire and various&#13;
laboratory investigations. The respondent-driven sampling (RDS) was&#13;
used to obtain the sample of respondents. A total of 114 HIV positive&#13;
MSM completed the study and were all subjected to a battery of tests.&#13;
Blood was drawn for alcohol, syphilis, hepatitis B, and viral load tests,&#13;
while urine was used to screen for drugs and gonorrhoea. Half (57) of&#13;
the HIV positive MSM were actively followed and risk reduction&#13;
interventions such as adherence to ARVs, general counselling, and&#13;
HIV prevention measures such as prompt treatment of STI/OI and&#13;
condom use were offered after every 2 months. The control group (57)&#13;
received no risk reduction interventions. Thereafter, both groups were&#13;
asked to respond to a questionnaire. Since the study was carried out&#13;
during COVID-19, the risk reduction interventions were conducted&#13;
over the phone to minimize transmission. Log-binomial univariate&#13;
and the multivariate regression analysis model was used to identify&#13;
the variables which were associated with undetectable viral load.&#13;
Undetectable viral load was defined as having an HIV viral load of&#13;
less than 50 copies/ml. Data generated from the questionnaires were&#13;
collected, cleaned, coded and analysed using STATA software,&#13;
Version 17. Level of significance was fixed at 5% (95% confidence&#13;
interval).&#13;
Findings: Majority of MSM living with HIV were between 19-20&#13;
years and 49% were actively followed by the researcher and received&#13;
risk reduction interventions while 54% were in the control group.&#13;
However, the baseline demographic characteristics were not&#13;
significantly different (all p&gt;0.05). MSM in the control group who&#13;
were neither Christian nor Muslim (11%) and had a lower income&#13;
(35%), were likely to have detectable viral load. However, MSM who&#13;
had a higher income in both groups (1.8%), were likely to have&#13;
undetectable viral load. MSM in the control group, who reported ever&#13;
use of PEP/PrEP (44%), were likely to have detectable viral load&#13;
while MSM who received interventions, who reported condom break&#13;
more than once during anal sex (61%), who had more than one regular&#13;
anal sex partner (61% both groups), and those who drunk more than 2&#13;
bottles of beer (33% both groups) were likely to have undetectable&#13;
viral load. However, MSM who received interventions but used non-&#13;
prescribed injectables drugs 1 to 2 times in a week (15%), were likely&#13;
to have detectable viral load. MSM in the control group who reported&#13;
being always high on alcohol during anal sex (19%), were likely to&#13;
have detectable viral load but those chewing muguka (type of khat)&#13;
(79%) were likely to have undetectable viral load. MSM who received&#13;
interventions who reported feeling uneasy while seeking health&#13;
services (75%), had detectable viral load while those in the control&#13;
group who attended private clinics (42%), had undetectable viral load.&#13;
Overall, after six months, the proportion of MSM achieving viral load&#13;
suppression was significantly higher in the intervention group as&#13;
compared to control group by 60% (95% CI 49‒70)), p-value &lt; 0.001.&#13;
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study&#13;
found out that majority of HIV positive MSM who received risk&#13;
reduction intervention, had undetectable viral load as compared to&#13;
those in the control group. HIV viral suppression is the desirable&#13;
outcome for MSM on ART, since once achieved, MSM cannot&#13;
transmit the virus to their sex partners. The Government/NGO should&#13;
encourage peer-led HIV services to run the HIV programmes&#13;
involving MSM with other stakeholders. Thus, many MSM will be&#13;
able to access the HIV services where their needs will be addressed&#13;
and supported in a non-judgemental environment.
https://doi.org/10.47604/jhmn.3022
</description>
<dc:date>2024-10-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
